Skip to content

Compare

Gamemanage vs the alternatives

Where another tool is the better pick, we say so. Here is how Gamemanage lines up against txAdmin, Pterodactyl and Multicraft.

FeatureGamemanagetxAdminPterodactylMulticraft
Games coveredFiveM, RedM, Rust, CS2, Minecraft, PalworldFiveM and RedMMany, via community eggsMinecraft
Hosting modelHosted, agent dials outRuns on your server boxSelf-hosted, you run the panelSelf-hosted or via a host
You manage a VPS or daemonNoYes, the FXServer boxYes, panel plus Wings daemonYes, the panel and daemon
Open inbound portsNone, outbound onlyWeb port on the boxPanel and daemon portsPanel and daemon ports
Cross-server bansYes, identities and HWIDs follow the playerPer serverNot built inNot built in
Backups and rollbackPalworld todayFiveM data via the boxFile backups you configureScheduled world backups
PriceFree tier, then 9 to 49 a month flatFreeFree and open sourcePaid license per slots

When to use which

The honest version

txAdmin

Pick it for

Running a single FiveM or RedM server from the box it lives on. It is free, official, and deeply tied into FXServer.

Where Gamemanage differs

Once you run more than one server, or want bans that follow a player across servers, or a second game, Gamemanage gives you one panel for all of it instead of one txAdmin per box.

Pterodactyl

Pick it for

Hosts and tinkerers who want to run their own multi-game panel and do not mind maintaining a Linux box, the panel, and the Wings daemon.

Where Gamemanage differs

Gamemanage is hosted, so there is no panel server or daemon to keep patched. The agent dials out, so there are no panel ports to expose.

Multicraft

Pick it for

Minecraft hosts who license a panel to resell server slots to customers.

Where Gamemanage differs

Gamemanage is for the person running the servers, not reselling them, and it covers five more games next to Minecraft in the same dashboard.

The cleanest way to compare is to connect one server free and look.